We test AI systems against realistic everyday engineering tasks, each with a verified correct answer under a named national practice — and report exactly where they fail, citing the standard, clause or national annex they got wrong.
Steel connection check, Eurocode 3
Base standard default used; German National Annex value governs
Would fail inspection
Realistic everyday engineering tasks with verified correct answers under a named national practice. We run your AI against them and report each failure, citing the standard, clause or national annex it got wrong. Subscription based, because standards change.
Verified engineers with the relevant national qualification and practice experience, reviewing output directly. Chartered where the work requires it.
A documented assessment you can put in front of your own customers, your insurer or a regulator.
In order of who needs it soonest.
Which AI system, which kinds of work, which jurisdictions. We say plainly what we can and cannot test.
A small batch of tasks through the full pipeline so you can judge finding quality before committing.
Suites run against your system; contested findings adjudicated by a second verified engineer.
Structured findings with standard citations, reviewer credentials and a full audit trail.
European AI regulation is phasing in on fixed dates. Obligations for high risk systems begin to apply from August 2026, and formal European model evaluation capacity is expected to become operational around 2027. That makes this mandated, budgeted demand — not discretionary spend.
GDPR-compliant processing
All reviewers under NDA
Annual credential re-verification
Findings cite the governing clause